Quais são os preditores da aliança terapêutica?

Quais são os preditores da aliança terapêutica?

 

No âmbito do projeto de investigação 178/12 - How collaboration in psychotherapy becomes therapeutic: a study of interactive and psychophysiological processes in good and poor outcome cases, apoiado pela Fundação BIAL, Eugénia Pereira e colaboradores publicaram o artigo Data mining techniques in psychotherapy: applications for studying therapeutic alliance na revista científica Scientific Reports. Aplicando técnicas de exploração de dados e de aprendizagem automática (AA), o estudo pretendia identificar os fatores que impactam significativamente a força da aliança terapêutica (AT) entre clientes e psicoterapeutas. Os resultados demonstraram que a frequência cardíaca (FC) do terapeuta estava associada de forma negativa com a AT do terapeuta. Por outro lado, a atividade eletrodérmica (EDA) emergiu como a característica biológica mais influente na previsão da AT no cliente, mas não no terapeuta. Assim, os resultados do algoritmo AA documentam a importância diferencial das variáveis ​​fisiológicas no terapeuta e no cliente (FC e EDA, respetivamente), para a previsão da AT, sugerindo diferentes experiências para a díade durante as sessões de terapia e com diferentes mecanismos neurofisiológicos subjacentes.

 

ABSTRACT

Therapeutic Alliance (TA) has been consistently reported as a robust predictor of therapy outcomes and is one of the most investigated therapy relational factors. Research on therapists' and clients’ contributions to the alliance development and the alliance-outcome relationship had shown mixed results. The relation of the therapist’s and client’s biological markers with the alliance is an important and under-investigated topic. Taking advantage of data mining techniques, this exploratory study aimed to investigate the role of different therapist and client factors, including heart rate (HR) and electrodermal activity (EDA), in relation to TA. Twenty-two dyads with 6 therapists and 22 clients participated in the study. The Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) was used to evaluate the client’s and therapist's perception of the alliance at the end of each session and through the therapy processes. The Cross-Industry Standard Process for Data Mining (CRISP-DM) was used to explore patterns that may contribute to TA. Machine Learning (ML) models have been employed to provide insights into the predictors and correlates of TA. Our results showed that Linear Regression (LR) was the best technique for predicting the therapist’s TA, with client “Diagnostic” and therapy “Termination” being identified as significant predictors of the therapist’s TA. In addition, for clients’ TA, the Random Forest (RF) was shown to have the best performance. The therapist’s TA and therapy “Outcome” were observed as the most influential predictors for the client’s TA. In addition, while the Heart Rate (therapist) was negatively associated with the therapist’s TA, EDA in the client was a physiological indicator related to the client’s TA. Overall, these findings can assist in identifying key factors that therapists should focus on to enhance the quality of therapeutic alliance. Results are discussed in terms of their consistency with empirical literature, innovative and interdisciplinary research on the therapeutic alliance field, and, in particular, the use of the Data Mining approach in a psychotherapy context.